Categories
| » | Amateurs |
| » | Artistic nude |
| » | Asian |
| » | BBW |
| » | BDSM |
| » | Beach |
| » | Big boobs |
| » | Bizarre |
| » | Black |
| » | Butts |
| » | Cartoons |
| » | Catfights |
| » | Celebrities |
| » | Close up |
| » | Clothing fetish |
| » | Feet and shoes |
| » | Femdom |
| » | Glamour models |
| » | Goths |
| » | Hairy |
| » | Indian |
| » | Latex |
| » | Latina |
| » | Legs and pantyhose |
| » | Lesbian |
| » | Lingerie |
| » | Machines |
| » | Male nudity |
| » | Mature |
| » | Non-nude |
| » | Nudism |
| » | Panties |
| » | Parties |
| » | Pissing |
| » | Pregnant |
| » | Public nudity |
| » | Shaved |
| » | Smoking |
| » | Solo girls |
| » | Spanking |
| » | Sports |
| » | Strippers |
| » | Tease |
| » | Teens (18+) |
| » | Toys |
| » | Transsexual |
| » | Upskirt |
| » | Vintage |
| » | Voyeur |
| » | Wet and messy |
81%
| Content quality | 25/30 |
| Content amount | 12/15 |
| Updates | 11/15 |
| Entertainment | 12/15 |
| Exclusivity | 5/5 |
| Navigation | 8/10 |
| Design | 4/5 |
| Download | 4/5 |
Action
| Posing | 60% |
| Masturbation | 30% |
| Lesbian sex | 10% |
Nudity
| Nude | 70% |
| Topless | 10% |
| Lingerie or bikini | 10% |
| Dressed | 10% |
Personnel
| Single female | 80% |
| Multiple females | 20% |
Location
| Indoor private | 90% |
| Outdoor private | 10% |
Other reviews
|
The Best Porn Adult Reviews HQ Porn Spots |
84.3% 8/10 87.1% |
| Super Glam |
 |
|
| Categories: Glamour models | ||
| Review last updated: 4 March 2009 | ||
| Trial: | - | |
| Month: | $29.95 | visit site |
| Longer: | $59.95 (3 months) | |
| PICTURES | VIDEOS | |
| 291+ galleries (avg 200 pics) | AMOUNT | 225+ (avg 10 mins) |
|
1500 pixels 900 pixels 750 pixels |
QUALITY |
640x480 MPEG, 2000k (latest) 384x288 MPEG 1200k (older) |
| 1 gallery per week | UPDATE | 1 video per week |
| ZIP files: Yes | DOWNLOAD | Downloadable videos: Yes DRM: No |
| Extras: Feeds, live cams |
Superglam declares
itself to be the ‘world’s best glamour porn site’, featuring the hottest
European women on the net. I’ll certainly be more than impressed if that
proves to be the case, though of course I’ve learnt to take such
extravagant boasts with not so much a pinch as a truckload of salt.
Nonetheless there are some real beauties showcased on the tour and
things at least look very professional, so perhaps it won’t be another
case of falsely raised hopes.
With a mere 79 models, Superglam isn’t going to win any awards on that
front, though as mentioned there are some real cuties here (most of whom
glam sites regulars will recognise such as Suzie Carina and Mia). The
photography is high quality, with no obvious technical defects or over-photoshopping
to the images, though how they work out the stated resolutions of 4000,
2000 and 1000 pixels is beyond me - actual resolutions are 1500, 900 and
750 pixels. The ladies and the locations are suitably glamorous,
however, and overall Superglam has a good, reasonably sized picture
collection.
There are also a fair number of videos, though resolution is no better
than acceptable for the latest clips and fairly poor for the older ones.
The use of the increasingly unfavoured MPEG format is also slightly
surprising, but the clips are adequately sharp and smooth in playback.
As is the norm with glamour sites, in most of the clips the girls do
some explicit posing and/or satisfy themselves with dildos, though
there’s some hot lesbian scenes in the mix too (but no dudes on this
site). The content is bulked out with interviews and backstage footage.
A reasonably useful search feature is provided, which includes the
somewhat comical ‘slut factor’ criterion as well as the vaguely baffling
‘spit or swallow’ one (baffling since there’s no hardcore on the site).
Some basic browsing options have been implemented such as the ability to
change the number of thumbnails per page.
So far so (relatively) good, but the major turd in the drainpipe emerges
when you look at the updating schedule - only one new video and one new
gallery per week. Suffice to say there is plenty of room for improvement
there. In fact there’s little really to substantiate Superglam’s claim
of pre-eminence in this niche, and though the material is exclusive, in
respect of almost all other criteria this site ends up falling just a
little bit short.
visit Super Glam