Categories

» Amateurs
» Artistic nude
» Asian
» BBW
» BDSM
» Beach
» Big boobs
» Bizarre
» Black
» Butts
» Cartoons
» Catfights
» Celebrities
» Close up
» Clothing fetish
» Feet and shoes
» Femdom
» Glamour models
» Goths
» Hairy
» Indian
» Latex
» Latina
» Legs and pantyhose
» Lesbian
» Lingerie
» Machines
» Male nudity
» Mature
» Non-nude
» Nudism
» Panties
» Parties
» Pissing
» Pregnant
» Public nudity
» Shaved
» Smoking
» Solo girls
» Spanking
» Sports
» Strippers
» Tease
» Teens (18+)
» Toys
» Transsexual
» Upskirt
» Vintage
» Voyeur
» Wet and messy

91%

Content quality 30/30
Content amount 13/15
Updates 13/15
Entertainment 14/15
Exclusivity 5/5
Navigation 8/10
Design 3/5
Download 5/5

SCORING CRITERIA

Action

Masturbation 50%
Posing 40%
Pissing 10%

Nudity

Nude 80%
Bottomless 10%
Topless 10%

Personnel

Single female 90%
Multiple females 10%

Location

Indoor private 90%
Outdoor private 10%

Other reviews

The Best Porn
Adult Reviews
Porn Reviews
HQ Porn Spots
87.8%
9.5/10
87%
88.3%


In the Crack
Categories:  Close up, Toys
Review last updated: 11 February 2009
Trial: -
Month: $34.95 visit site
Longer: -


PICTURES VIDEOS
249+ galleries (avg 90 pics) AMOUNT 259+ (146+ HD) (avg 50 mins)
2400 pixels
1100 pixels
QUALITY 1920x1080 WMV, 8000k
1280x720 WMV, 4000k
640x360 WMV, 1600k
1 gallery every 3 days UPDATE 1 video set every 3 days
ZIP files: Yes DOWNLOAD  Downloadable videos: Yes   DRM: No
Extras: None

The people behind In the Crack promise that this is no ordinary porn site. How is it different then, I hear you cry? Well, for starters top video resolution is 1920x1080 - not unprecedented in erotica but definitely approaching the toppermost of the toppermost. Secondly, they claim that their niche - close up ass crack and vaginal content - is pretty much unique to them. Again, not entirely accurate, but not far off. Thirdly, they purport to offer a demonstrable honesty about their content, a willingness to be entirely candid about how well the shoots went and how good they are. That would indeed be refreshingly welcome if it is true. Let’s put all these claims to the test.

The format for the videos is usually the same. The first clip, which is often the longest, features the model slowly stripping, allowing the camera to rove around her body (with special attention paid to the ass and pussy area of course). In subsequent clips we get a mixture of explicit pussy and ass posing and masturbation stuff with toys, and sometimes speculums. The level of anatomical detail shown in these clips at the highest resolution is absolutely mind-blowing. Never before have porn movies given the viewer so much an impression of actually ‘being there’. Often there is a final bonus scene which is an outtake or shows the girl briefly peeing, for example.

The quality of the pictures is almost as impressive, though such is the standard of the videos they could almost be vidcaps (they’re not) and it would hardly matter. The models will be familiar to those with the briefest of experience of trawling the net for porn, but they’re very sexy girls and well-suited to this type of work where every bodily detail is revealed. The site has recently moved from updating every two days to every three days - hardly a move in the right direction but not too big a blow given the size of each update. Over half of the episodes are now available in the highest video resolution.

Navigating around the site is not difficult, and I like the idea of the low resolution ‘sampler’ clips. The model index needs an overhaul though. The professed honesty about the content is also in evidence (they’re even quite candid about the looks and attitudes of the models, but never in a disrespectful way). But the true greatness of this site lies in the way it makes other porn videos look a bit rubbish by comparison. Close up pussy fans rejoice.

visit In the Crack